Re: Abridged summary of scala-language@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

Well, it would be an extra character for no compelling reason, and even when A is in fact B, A < B still holds because B is a subtype of itself.

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:43 PM, <2Bnoreply [at] googlegroups [dot] com" rel="nofollow">scala-language+noreply@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/topics

• Why <: and not <=: ? [1 Update]

 Topic: Why <: and not <=: ?

Dave <dave.mahabiersing@hotmail.com> Jul 02 04:14AM -0700 ^
 
If I understand typeclass with an upper boundery well then:
 
A <: B
 
means
 
A is a subtype of B or B itself (so B is inclusive)
 
Wouldn't
 
A<=: B
 
be more intuitive (I think the more...