The following source file fails to compile with 2.9 but compiles just
fine with 2.8. All it takes is the introduction of a type-annotation
that aliases the inferred type to fail the compiler. This makes me
boggle a little -- is it expected behaviour?
The following source file fails to compile with 2.9 but compiles just
fine with 2.8. All it takes is the introduction of a type-annotation
that aliases the inferred type to fail the compiler. This makes me
boggle a little -- is it expected behaviour?
cheersadriaan
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Tony Morris <tonymorris@gmail.com> wrote: