Re: Why doesn't Scala have static members inside a class?

Trolling, by jumping onto the mailing list and describing others here as fanboys, is *not* typical behaviour for someone who has come to accept that Java isn't perfect, and who allegedly "quite likes" Scala.

On 5 September 2011 06:57, Numan Salati <numan.salati@gmail.com> wrote:

you are making a couple of assumptions which are not correct

1. i think java is perfect. i dont
2. i find scala frustrating. i dont. actually i like lot of things about scala. and its fun learning it. 

--
Kevin Wright
mail: kevin.wright@scalatechnology.com
gtalk / msn : kev.lee.wright@gmail.com quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wrightgoogle+: http://gplus.to/thecoda
kev.lee.wright@gmail.com twitter: @thecoda
vibe / skype: kev.lee.wrightsteam: kev_lee_wright
"My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra