Re: Unsigned Arithmetic -- Humble Recommendation for Improving
Hi Peter,
> I can appreciate what you are trying to accomplish with this but I'm worried about the fact that the resulting type would be operation dependent.
And, what's wrong with that?
> Is it really worth cluttering up the specification to handle the one case of Char * Char? I suppose that's a matter of opinion based on just how badly one needs that operation. :)
I agree that some might find that a matter of taste. For me that's not
the case for I see that as a flaw in the current semantics of Scala
which I am pushing the fixture of. On the other hand, the most recent
change that I recommended is not such a seismic one.
Hi Peter,
> I can appreciate what you are trying to accomplish with this but I'm worried about the fact that the resulting type would be operation dependent.
And, what's wrong with that?
> Is it really worth cluttering up the specification to handle the one case of Char * Char? I suppose that's a matter of opinion based on just how badly one needs that operation. :)
I agree that some might find that a matter of taste. For me that's not
the case for I see that as a flaw in the current semantics of Scala
which I am pushing the fixture of. On the other hand, the most recent
change that I recommended is not such a seismic one.
TTFN,
--Hossein
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seyed H. HAERI (Hossein)
Research Assistant
Institute for Software Systems (STS)
Technical University of Hamburg (TUHH)
Hamburg, Germany
ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------