- About Scala
- Documentation
- Code Examples
- Software
- Scala Developers
Fwd: Re: [scala-devel] Github workflow - continue working on an issue that's already been pulled in
Wed, 2012-01-25, 16:43
Moved to internals.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [scala-devel] Github workflow - continue working on an issue that's already been pulled in Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:42:19 -0800 From: Paul Phillips
Reply-To:
To:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Aleksandar Prokopec <aleksandar [dot] prokopec [at] epfl [dot] ch" rel="nofollow">aleksandar.prokopec@epfl.ch> wrote:
Either of these is fine I think.
(Also, I should echo the feeling of others we should send these questions to -internals.)
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [scala-devel] Github workflow - continue working on an issue that's already been pulled in Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:42:19 -0800 From: Paul Phillips
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Aleksandar Prokopec <aleksandar [dot] prokopec [at] epfl [dot] ch" rel="nofollow">aleksandar.prokopec@epfl.ch> wrote:
Does anyone know what our policy is for continuing to work on an issue that's already been pulled in to scala/scala?
Should I:
1) start a new branch to refine what I did before on issue/XXXX? In this case, what is the naming convention?
2) or continue working on the old branch issue/XXXX (previously pulled to scala/scala) and just send the pull request again once I'm happy with my changes?
Either of these is fine I think.
(Also, I should echo the feeling of others we should send these questions to -internals.)