I used Hamcrest only to test it to make sure it works in ScalaTest. It
does, and I assume it would work in Specs as well. Specs or ScalaTest
matchers will give you a nicer Scala-enabled syntax than Hamcrest, but
if you're using JMock for example, you may want to pass a matcher in,
and JMock uses Hamcrest.
Bill
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
> do Scala test-infected folks use Hamcrest much? any micro-reviews of
> it to share?
>
> tx.
>
Hi Raoul,
I used Hamcrest only to test it to make sure it works in ScalaTest. It
does, and I assume it would work in Specs as well. Specs or ScalaTest
matchers will give you a nicer Scala-enabled syntax than Hamcrest, but
if you're using JMock for example, you may want to pass a matcher in,
and JMock uses Hamcrest.
Bill
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
> do Scala test-infected folks use Hamcrest much? any micro-reviews of
> it to share?
>
> tx.
>