- About Scala
- Documentation
- Code Examples
- Software
- Scala Developers
the rules for empty parameter lists might change: they would be optional only when calling Java methods
Wed, 2009-06-10, 11:15
Hi all,
Could you please tell if this https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/1973 is still considered for 2.8?
Thanks,
Peter
Could you please tell if this https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/1973 is still considered for 2.8?
Thanks,
Peter
Wed, 2009-06-10, 13:17
#2
Re: the rules for empty parameter lists might change: they wou
How would this work at the bytecode level?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Peter Hausel<peter.hausel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could you please tell if this https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/1973
> is still considered for 2.8?
>
Yes, the plan is to change this for 2.8.
Cheers
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Peter Hausel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could you please tell if this https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/1973
> is still considered for 2.8?
>
Yes, the plan is to change this for 2.8.
Cheers