This page is no longer maintained — Please continue to the home page at www.scala-lang.org

question about trac workflow

2 replies
Roland Kuhn
Joined: 2008-12-26,
User offline. Last seen 3 years 14 weeks ago.

Hi,

I've just uploaded a patch for https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/2074
and set that ticket to fixed, which made it 'closed'. Is that
correct or should that last step be done by someone with SVN commit
rights?

Ciao,

Roland

Erik Engbrecht
Joined: 2008-12-19,
User offline. Last seen 3 years 18 weeks ago.
Re: question about trac workflow
I think the last step should be done by someone with commit rights after committing the patch, because it's not really fixed until it is committed.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Roland Kuhn <rk@rkuhn.info> wrote:
Hi,

I've just uploaded a patch for https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/2074 and set that ticket to fixed, which made it 'closed'. Is that correct or should that last step be done by someone with SVN commit rights?

Ciao,

Roland



--
http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/
Roland Kuhn
Joined: 2008-12-26,
User offline. Last seen 3 years 14 weeks ago.
Re: question about trac workflow

Hi Erik,

okay, sounds sensible, so I've reopened it. To me, it seems that the
state "patch available" is missing, otherwise, how do you find all
tickets which are in principle resolved?

Ciao,

Roland

On 29 Jun 2009, at 23:46, Erik Engbrecht wrote:

> I think the last step should be done by someone with commit rights
> after committing the patch, because it's not really fixed until it
> is committed.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just uploaded a patch for https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/2074
> and set that ticket to fixed, which made it 'closed'. Is that
> correct or should that last step be done by someone with SVN commit
> rights?
>
> Ciao,
>
> Roland
>
>
>

Copyright © 2012 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland