- About Scala
- Documentation
- Code Examples
- Software
- Scala Developers
2.8 => 3.0
Sun, 2009-10-25, 18:19
It seems like there are a lot of breaking changes in 2.8. (new collection api, syntax changes etc.)
Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?
Do the scala developers really want to deal with legacy already?
-- Erlend
Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?
Do the scala developers really want to deal with legacy already?
-- Erlend
Mon, 2009-10-26, 14:47
#2
Re: 2.8 => 3.0
sorry, I should have searched before posting.
Thanks.
-- Erlend
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Francois <fanf42@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks.
-- Erlend
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Francois <fanf42@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25/10/2009 18:18, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?
There was a lot of thing said on that subject lately, please see information here before carrying along this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1685/focus=1701
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1710/focus=1734
On 25/10/2009 18:18, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
> Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?
There was a lot of thing said on that subject lately, please see
information here before carrying along this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1685/focus=1701
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1710/focus=1734