- About Scala
- Documentation
- Code Examples
- Software
- Scala Developers
Git, again. Please go for it.
Wed, 2009-11-25, 11:01
To Scala Team:
This has been raised before. I really think migrating to Git will give
you a productivity boost. Is any Scala committer using Git to develop
Scala (besides Paul)?
I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
I am currently using git over svn at work (via command-line, I
confess) and I am happier than ever with my stashing, branching and
partial committing, so I can imagine what would happen if I were using
a full git stack.
Just my $0.02
BR
Christos
Wed, 2009-11-25, 11:17
#2
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
This has been raised before. I really think migrating to Git will giveYes, I've been using git-svn exclusively for several months and love it (have been working on a process where every ticket gets its own branch, and each branch is tested individually on a separate build server before committing to svn trunk,...).
you a productivity boost. Is any Scala committer using Git to develop
Scala (besides Paul)?
Iulian has also been using (and liking, afaict) it, and others are beginning to explore it.
We are working on the conversion, but it's going to take a while. Currently, our sole focus is on doing the best job we possibly can on the 2.8 release.
cheersadriaan
Wed, 2009-11-25, 11:57
#3
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:13, Adriaan Moors
wrote:
>> This has been raised before. I really think migrating to Git will give
>> you a productivity boost. Is any Scala committer using Git to develop
>> Scala (besides Paul)?
>
> Yes, I've been using git-svn exclusively for several months and love it
> (have been working on a process where every ticket gets its own branch, and
> each branch is tested individually on a separate build server before
> committing to svn trunk,...).
> Iulian has also been using (and liking, afaict) it, and others are beginning
> to explore it.
> We are working on the conversion, but it's going to take a while.
Glad to hear it's already being worked upon.
> Currently, our sole focus is on doing the best job we possibly can on the
> 2.8 release.
No doubt, releasing 2.8 is Priority One.
BR
Christos
Wed, 2009-11-25, 16:57
#4
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Christos KK Loverdos <loverdos@gmail.com> wrote:
To Scala Team:
This has been raised before. I really think migrating to Git will give
you a productivity boost. Is any Scala committer using Git to develop
Scala (besides Paul)?
I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
I am currently using git over svn at work (via command-line, I
confess) and I am happier than ever with my stashing, branching and
partial committing, so I can imagine what would happen if I were using
a full git stack.
Svn is to Git as Java is to Scala. Once you have used the better one, it's very difficult to remember how you functioned with the inferior one.
My 2 cents.
Just my $0.02
BR
Christos
--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
Wed, 2009-11-25, 17:07
#5
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 17:42, David Pollak
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Christos KK Loverdos
> wrote:
>>
>> To Scala Team:
>>
>> This has been raised before. I really think migrating to Git will give
>> you a productivity boost. Is any Scala committer using Git to develop
>> Scala (besides Paul)?
>>
>> I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
>> is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
>>
>> I am currently using git over svn at work (via command-line, I
>> confess) and I am happier than ever with my stashing, branching and
>> partial committing, so I can imagine what would happen if I were using
>> a full git stack.
>
> Svn is to Git as Java is to Scala. Once you have used the better one, it's
> very difficult to remember how you functioned with the inferior one.
It also leaves a feeling of "_how_ did I function back then?"
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>>
>> Just my $0.02
>>
>> BR
>> Christos
>>
>> --
>> __~O
>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Surf the harmonics
>
Thu, 2009-12-03, 08:17
#6
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:01 +0200, Christos KK Loverdos wrote:
> I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
> is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
First release has just been announced:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/134313
Best,
Ismael
Thu, 2009-12-03, 10:27
#7
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
> Svn is to Git as Java is to Scala. Once you have used the better one, it's
> very difficult to remember how you functioned with the inferior one.
I went through the same experience. No turning back now.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>>
>> Just my $0.02
>>
>> BR
>> Christos
>>
>> --
>> __~O
>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Surf the harmonics
>
Thu, 2009-12-03, 10:37
#8
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
> Svn is to Git as Java is to Scala. Once you have used the better one, it's
> very difficult to remember how you functioned with the inferior one.
>
I went through the same experience. No turning back now.
> My 2 cents.
>
>>
>> Just my $0.02
>>
>> BR
>> Christos
>>
>> --
>> __~O
>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Surf the harmonics
>
Thu, 2009-12-03, 11:37
#9
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 09:10, Ismael Juma wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:01 +0200, Christos KK Loverdos wrote:
>> I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
>> is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
>
> First release has just been announced:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/134313
It seems to have some Github integration. Need to investigate further,
but I am behind a nasty proxy right now.
>
> Best,
> Ismael
>
>
Thu, 2009-12-03, 11:47
#10
Re: Git, again. Please go for it.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Christos KK Loverdos <loverdos@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 09:10, Ismael Juma <mlists@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:01 +0200, Christos KK Loverdos wrote:
>> I understand there are tool-related issues (SmartSVN --- but SmartGIT
>> is coming!) and even coding habits but you should *really* try it out.
>
> First release has just been announced:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/134313
It seems to have some Github integration. Need to investigate further,
but I am behind a nasty proxy right now.
Nasty proxies FTL :/
>
> Best,
> Ismael
>
>
--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
--
Viktor Klang
| "A complex system that works is invariably
| found to have evolved from a simple system
| that worked." - John Gall
Blog: klangism.blogspot.com
Twttr: twitter.com/viktorklang
Code: github.com/viktorklang
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:01 +0200, Christos KK Loverdos wrote:
> Is any Scala committer using Git to develop Scala (besides Paul)?
Adriaan does as far as I know (at least sometimes). Not sure about
others.
> I am currently using git over svn at work (via command-line, I
> confess) and I am happier than ever with my stashing, branching and
> partial committing, so I can imagine what would happen if I were using
> a full git stack.
Yes. In my opinion, it makes sense to do this after 2.8.0 is released,
however.
Best,
Ismael