Re: 2.7.3 and serializable frustrations again

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:04 +0100, Antonio Cunei wrote:
> From what I see in the ticket, the issue was initially fixed and a
> regression test was in fact added. At a later time, it was noticed that in
> one additional case the bug would still emerge; a further fix was applied
> to solve that, but the regression test was not extended to cover that
> additional case. And, out of bad luck, that case subsequently somehow broke
> again at some point.

You're right. I had just looked at the commit for the further fix:

https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/changeset/15634

Still, the main point stands since the additional case also included
example code. Note that I was not trying to play the blame game, I was
simply emphasizing how important it is to include tests when the user
provides one (or an example that can easily be converted into a test).

Ismael