Missing Entries in Nightly ScalaDoc HTML.

I believe this is because there are special cases to omit the
FunctionN, etc, cases. It may be that AbstractFunctionN just doesn't
have a special case for it.

Donna

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a long time the nightly ScalaDoc output has been missing some
> classes. Specifically, while it includes Function1 and Function2, it
> omits all other FunctionN. The same pattern holds for the TupleN and
> ProductN classes.
>
> On the other hand, all 23 AbstractFunctionN classes are included.
>
>
> Randall Schulz
>

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:26:32PM +0200, Donna Malayeri wrote:
> I believe this is because there are special cases to omit the
> FunctionN, etc, cases. It may be that AbstractFunctionN just doesn't
> have a special case for it.

Omitting the boilerplate classes is definitively a feature, it's only a
question of how to communicate their existence. I'd like to meet the
guy who wants to read the docs for Function20 after having mastered
Function1-19. "OK, I hope I'm ready for this... deep breath... time to
have my mind blown!"