I strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one

+1 and lolz for Randall

On 14 Dec 2010 16:00, "martin odersky" <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1 and lolz for Randall

On 14 Dec 2010 16:00, "martin odersky" <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Ivan Porto Carerro <ivan@mojolly.com> wrote:

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:02 PM, David Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk> wrote:

2010/12/14 martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch>:
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Yes.

+1 and lolz for Randall

On 14 Dec 2010 16:00, "martin odersky" <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Walter Chang <weihsiu@gmail.com> wrote:

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:59 PM, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

- Colin

+1

- Colin

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

- Colin

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Colin Bullock wrote:
> +1
>
> - Colin
>

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

+1

+1

+1

+1

2010/12/14 Alec Zorab :
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Colin Bullock wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> - Colin
>>
>

+1

2010/12/14 Alec Zorab :
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Colin Bullock wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> - Colin
>>
>

+1

2010/12/14 Alec Zorab :
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Colin Bullock wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> - Colin
>>
>

Yep, one by one is preferable!

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
>

This one.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:59 PM, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

This one.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:59 PM, martin odersky <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:

This is a poll.

Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

Thanks

Yep, one by one is preferable!

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
>

Yep, one by one is preferable!

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
>

+1 pleaseThanksKarel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hear, hear.

Playful, minor, flamebait:

I prefer top-quoting - like this - because if I already have a thread's
context in my head, like when I'm reading in a threaded view in my mail
client, I don't want to have to scroll through all the redundant quoted
text when reading a message, just to find the last couple of lines of
new information.

martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does
> not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hear, hear.

Playful, minor, flamebait:

I prefer top-quoting - like this - because if I already have a thread's
context in my head, like when I'm reading in a threaded view in my mail
client, I don't want to have to scroll through all the redundant quoted
text when reading a message, just to find the last couple of lines of
new information.

martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does
> not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>

+1

+ 1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
>

+1

> This is a poll.

>

> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups

> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text

> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

>

> Thanks

>
>  -- Martin

--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Brian Schlining
bschlining@gmail.com

+1
for no real reason, i just like it better.

Am 14.12.2010 21:56, schrieb Clint Gilbert:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hear, hear.
>
> Playful, minor, flamebait:
>
> I prefer top-quoting - like this - because if I already have a thread's
> context in my head, like when I'm reading in a threaded view in my mail
> client, I don't want to have to scroll through all the redundant quoted
> text when reading a message, just to find the last couple of lines of
> new information.
>
> martin odersky wrote:
>> This is a poll.
>>
>> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
>> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text does
>> not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk0H2ecACgkQ5IyIbnMUeTvmKwCdEn/RkOBt5ODwRHKGujU5d/AC
> lKkAniycfJS2TBgVY6QgntX1jksp4ySn
> =A0Pu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

+1 for one-by-one

-JimC

+1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
>

+1
On 15/12/2010, at 12:42 PM, Pedro Furlanetto wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:59 PM, martin odersky wrote:
>> This is a poll.
>>
>> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
>> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
>> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Martin
>>

+1

+1

+ Long.MaxValue

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Robert Wills <wrwills@gmail.com> wrote:

+1

--
Viktor Klang,
Code Connoisseur
Work:   Scalable Solutions
Code:   github.com/viktorklang
Follow: twitter.com/viktorklang
Read:   klangism.tumblr.com

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:02:14AM +0100, √iktor Klang wrote:
> + Long.MaxValue

And with that, let's tally the votes.

scala> 100L + Long.MaxValue
res0: Long = -9223372036854775709

Dewey defeats Truman!

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:02:14AM +0100, √iktor Klang wrote:
> + Long.MaxValue

And with that, let's tally the votes.

scala> 100L + Long.MaxValue
res0: Long = -9223372036854775709

Dewey defeats Truman!

Mission accomplished :-)
 

--
Paul Phillips      | Adultery is the application of democracy to love.
Future Perfect     |     -- H. L. Mencken
Empiricist         |
i pull his palp!   |----------* http://www.improving.org/paulp/ *----------

--
Viktor Klang,
Code Connoisseur
Work:   Scalable Solutions
Code:   github.com/viktorklang
Follow: twitter.com/viktorklang
Read:   klangism.tumblr.com

This gets my vote.

odersky@gmail.com wrote on 14/12/2010 14:59:50:

> [scala] I strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one
>
> martin odersky
>
> to:
>
> scala-internals, Scala list, scala-announce, Scala User
>
> 14/12/10 15:01
>
> Sent by:
>
> odersky@gmail.com
>
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google
> groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala
> lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message. Although we attempt to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, we do not guarantee that either are virus-free and accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.

Please refer to http://www.bnymellon.com/disclaimer/piml.html for certain disclosures.

This gets my vote.

odersky@gmail.com wrote on 14/12/2010 14:59:50:

> [scala] I strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one
>
> martin odersky
>
> to:
>
> scala-internals, Scala list, scala-announce, Scala User
>
> 14/12/10 15:01
>
> Sent by:
>
> odersky@gmail.com
>
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google
> groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala
> lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message. Although we attempt to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, we do not guarantee that either are virus-free and accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.

Please refer to http://www.bnymellon.com/disclaimer/piml.html for certain disclosures.

This gets my vote.

odersky@gmail.com wrote on 14/12/2010 14:59:50:

> [scala] I strongly prefer receiving google groups messages one by one
>
> martin odersky
>
> to:
>
> scala-internals, Scala list, scala-announce, Scala User
>
> 14/12/10 15:01
>
> Sent by:
>
> odersky@gmail.com
>
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google
> groups messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala
> lists. The text does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>
>  -- Martin
This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message. Although we attempt to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, we do not guarantee that either are virus-free and accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.

Please refer to http://www.bnymellon.com/disclaimer/piml.html for certain disclosures.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky said
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky said
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky said
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.
>
> Thanks
>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

+1

Romildo

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

+1

Romildo

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:59:50PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
> This is a poll.
>
> Please respond to this mail if you strongly prefer receiving google groups
> messages one by one, same as they were sent to the scala lists. The text
> does not matter -- I will simply count responses.

+1

Romildo