halfway to nothing

Oh, it's even more pronounced if I don't flip to 32bit. And here I thought I was rigging it in my favor.

% while true; do time scala29 -nc -e '()' ; time scala3 -nc -e '()' ; done |& grep real
real 0m4.537s
real 0m1.854s
real 0m4.328s
real 0m1.853s
real 0m4.220s
real 0m1.852s
real 0m4.255s
real 0m1.904s
real 0m4.421s
real 0m1.954s

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Paul Phillips wrote:
> Have now shaved more than half the startup time relative to 2.9.0.  Here we are oscillating between it and r25007.

Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait for
the subsequent one?

Best,
Ismael

Woot, nice work Paul!

On May 21, 2011 9:05 PM, "Paul Phillips" <paulp@improving.org> wrote:
> Oh, it's even more pronounced if I don't flip to 32bit. And here I thought I was rigging it in my favor.
>
> % while true; do time scala29 -nc -e '()' ; time scala3 -nc -e '()' ; done |& grep real
> real 0m4.537s
> real 0m1.854s
> real 0m4.328s
> real 0m1.853s
> real 0m4.220s
> real 0m1.852s
> real 0m4.255s
> real 0m1.904s
> real 0m4.421s
> real 0m1.954s

On 5/21/11 12:08 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait for
> the subsequent one?

This will wait.

On Saturday May 21 2011, Paul Phillips wrote:
> On 5/21/11 12:08 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> > Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait
> > for the subsequent one?
>
> This will wait.

Always holdin' out on us!

RRS

3.0? 

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> wrote:

On 5/21/11 12:08 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait for
> the subsequent one?

This will wait.

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Josh Suereth <joshua.suereth@gmail.com> wrote:

3.0? 

Hopefully not that long... -- Martin
 

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> wrote:

On 5/21/11 12:08 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait for
> the subsequent one?

This will wait.

--
----------------------------------------------
Martin Odersky
Prof., EPFL and CEO, Typesafe
PSED, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Tel. EPFL: +41 21 693 6863
Tel. Typesafe: +41 21 691 4967

Ah, I was refering to the script name.

On May 22, 2011 7:14 AM, "martin odersky" <martin.odersky@epfl.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Josh Suereth <joshua.suereth@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 3.0?
>>
>> Hopefully not that long... -- Martin
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/21/11 12:08 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>>> > Nice! Will this be part of the next bug-fix update or will it wait for
>>> > the subsequent one?
>>>
>>> This will wait.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
> Martin Odersky
> Prof., EPFL <http://www.epfl.ch> and CEO, Typesafe <http://www.typesafe.com>
> PSED, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
> Tel. EPFL: +41 21 693 6863
> Tel. Typesafe: +41 21 691 4967

On 5/22/11 5:56 AM, Josh Suereth wrote:
> Ah, I was refering to the script name.

Oh, I didn't realize I'd exposed that. It doesn't mean anything. I
have a zillion aliases for scala versions, and scala29 was my latest
tested build of 29 until 2.9.0 came out. Now I need a new alias for my
latest build, and scala210 is annoying in terms of finger mechanics,
file completion, lexical ordering, etc. whereas scala3 isn't.